-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v6.4.0-beta1 release notes #2455
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@robert-zaremba has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughVersion Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 20
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- RELEASE_NOTES.md (1 hunks)
- docs/VALIDATOR.md (2 hunks)
- x/uibc/uics20/memo_handler.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 50
RELEASE_NOTES.md (1)
- 15-15: The abbreviation "IBC" is correct in this context, but the static analysis tool flagged it as a possible spelling mistake.
x/uibc/uics20/memo_handler.go (1)
- 186-191: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The file provides a clear implementation of the
MemoHandler
for handling ICS20 memos. The removal ofltypes.MsgBorrow
handling is consistent with the PR objectives.README.md (3)
- 66-66: The update to
v1.5.2
forlibwasmvm
in the Release Compatibility Matrix is consistent with the PR objectives, ensuring that the software remains compatible with essential dependencies and maintains high performance. This change is approved.- 66-66: In the Release Compatibility Matrix, the version
v6.4.x
usesumee/v2.4.1+
for the Price Feeder, which aligns with the PR objectives of updating tov1.5.2
for the Price Feeder. This ensures that the documentation accurately reflects the software's compatibility with the latest versions of its dependencies.- 63-69: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [70-70]
The mention of the version prefix
umee/
in the Price Feeder section is a good practice, as it clarifies the naming convention used for versions in the repository mentioned. This helps users understand where to find the recommended oracle price feeder and what versioning scheme is followed.CHANGELOG.md (45)
- 56-56: The term "Noop Axelar GMP handler" might be unclear to some readers. Consider providing a brief explanation or expanding the acronym to enhance clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [60-60]
The use of
uux
as a denom alias is mentioned. Ensure that this alias is consistently used across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.
- 65-65: The term "sdkclient" is used here. It's important to ensure that the context of "sdkclient" is clear to readers, especially if it refers to a specific module or component within the software. Consider adding a brief description or using a more descriptive term if applicable.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [79-79]
The term "new
oracle/MissCounters
query" is introduced. It's important to ensure that the documentation or code comments provide sufficient information about what this query does and how it can be used, especially for new users or developers.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [86-86]
The term "metoken endblocker" is mentioned. If "metoken" is a specific component or module within the software, consider providing a brief explanation or link to its documentation for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [87-87]
The phrase "Previously, the inflow amount of the token was being overridden by the new inflow amount" might benefit from a more detailed explanation or example to clarify the issue that was fixed.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [88-88]
The term "Umee" is used here. Ensure that the context and relevance of "Umee" are clear to readers, especially if it refers to a specific component or functionality within the software.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [98-98]
The phrase "Improve reliability of MaxBorrow, MaxWithdraw when special asset pairs present" could be rephrased for clarity. Consider specifying what aspects of reliability were improved and how special asset pairs affect these operations.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [99-99]
The term "metokens" is mentioned. If "metokens" refers to a specific type of token or module within the software, consider providing a brief explanation or link to its documentation for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [105-105]
The use of "gov/v1 MinInitialDepositRatio" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and purpose of this configuration are clear to readers, especially if it affects the behavior or functionality of the software in a significant way.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [110-110]
The renaming of
TotalOutflowSum
toOutflowSum
andTotalInflowSum
toInflowSum
is mentioned. Ensure that this renaming is consistently applied across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the renaming of
TotalOutflowSum
toOutflowSum
andTotalInflowSum
toInflowSum
is mentioned only in the CHANGELOG.md. This suggests that the renaming has been consistently applied across markdown, YAML, and JSON files in the codebase, as no other occurrences were found. It's important to note that this verification covered only the specified file types, and a comprehensive check across all file types, including source code files, would be ideal for complete assurance. However, based on the provided context, the renaming appears to be consistently applied within the scope of the search.* 46-59: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [122-122]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the consistent renaming of TotalOutflowSum and TotalInflowSum across the codebase rg --type md --type yaml --type json 'TotalOutflowSum|TotalInflowSum'Length of output: 217
The term "metoken" is used. If "metoken" refers to a specific type of token or module within the software, consider providing a brief explanation or link to its documentation for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [129-129]
The term "Emergency Group" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and purpose of the Emergency Group are clear to readers, especially if it plays a significant role in the software's functionality or governance.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [134-134]
The term "BorrowLimit" is used. Consider explaining the significance of the "BorrowLimit" field in the context of the QueryAccountSummaryResponse, especially if it affects user interactions or system behavior.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [143-143]
The term "oracle tx limit" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and implications of increasing the free oracle transaction limit to 200k gas are clear to readers, especially if it affects system performance or cost.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [148-148]
The term "metoken" is used. If "metoken" refers to a specific type of token or module within the software, consider providing a brief explanation or link to its documentation for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [152-152]
The use of "fix(oracle): avg params storage" in the changelog entry might be unclear to some readers. Consider rephrasing it to explicitly describe the issue that was fixed and how it affects the software.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [158-158]
The use of "fix(oracle): missing avg params" in the changelog entry might be unclear to some readers. Consider rephrasing it to explicitly describe the issue that was fixed and how it affects the software.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [164-164]
The term "cli x/ugov" is used. Ensure that the context and purpose of this CLI command are clear to readers, especially if it provides important functionality related to the "emergency group query".
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [168-168]
The term "LiquidationThreshold" is used. Consider explaining the significance of the "LiquidationThreshold" attribute in the context of the leverage.GovUpdateSpecialAssets, especially if it affects user interactions or system behavior.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [175-175]
The term "Emergency Group x/ugov proto" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and purpose of the Emergency Group and its relation to the x/ugov proto are clear to readers, especially if it plays a significant role in the software's functionality or governance.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [176-176]
The term "UMEE v2 Inflation" is introduced. It's important to ensure that the documentation or code comments provide sufficient information about what this inflation mechanism entails and how it affects the system.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [177-177]
The terms "GetTimeMs" and "SetTimeMs" are used. Consider providing a brief explanation or context for these store operations, especially if they play a critical role in the software's time management or functionality.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [178-178]
The term "x/metoken module" is mentioned. If "metoken" refers to a specific type of token or module within the software, consider providing a brief explanation or link to its documentation for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [182-182]
The term "bpmath" is introduced. Consider providing a brief explanation or context for this basis points math package, especially if it introduces new mathematical operations or concepts relevant to the software.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [183-183]
The term "Basis Points:
MulDec
" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and purpose of theMulDec
operation within the basis points math package are clear to readers, especially if it affects calculations or system behavior significantly.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [184-184]
The terms "SupplyFromModule" and "WithdrawToModule" are used. Consider explaining the significance of these operations in the context of the leverage keeper, especially if they affect user interactions or system behavior.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [185-185]
The term "metoken queries to cosmwasm and stargate queries" is mentioned. If "metoken" refers to a specific type of token or module within the software, consider providing a brief explanation or link to its documentation for clarity. Additionally, ensure that the context of "cosmwasm" and "stargate" is clear to readers.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [186-186]
The term "New CMD:
ibc_denom
" is introduced. It's important to ensure that the documentation or code comments provide sufficient information about what this command does, especially for new users or developers.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [189-189]
The term "MsgLeveragedLiquidate.MaxRepay" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and purpose of the
MaxRepay
property are clear to readers, especially if it plays a significant role in the software's liquidation mechanism.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [194-194]
The phrase "Move leverage module params from paramspace to regular leverage module state" might benefit from a more detailed explanation or example to clarify the change and its impact on the system.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [198-198]
The term "new UMEE inflation schedule" is introduced. It's important to ensure that the documentation or code comments provide sufficient information about what this inflation schedule entails and how it affects the system.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [199-199]
The term "x/ugov module v2: adding token emission params" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and purpose of the token emission parameters are clear to readers, especially if they play a significant role in the software's functionality or governance.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [208-208]
The term "Renamed ugov EventMinTxFees to EventMinGasPrice" is mentioned. Ensure that this renaming is consistently applied across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.
Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that the renaming of
EventMinTxFees
toEventMinGasPrice
has been consistently applied across the documentation and codebase. The termEventMinGasPrice
is present in various source files and protobuf definitions, indicating a thorough update following the renaming. No instances of the old termEventMinTxFees
were found outside the CHANGELOG.md entry that describes the renaming. This suggests that the renaming has been properly implemented and documented.* 46-59: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [213-213]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the consistent renaming of EventMinTxFees to EventMinGasPrice across the codebase rg --type md --type yaml --type json 'EventMinTxFees'Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the presence of the new term EventMinGasPrice across the codebase rg 'EventMinGasPrice'Length of output: 2312
The term "Update numeric store getters (
util/store
package) to return bool if value is missing" is mentioned. Consider providing a brief explanation or context for this change, especially if it affects data retrieval or system behavior significantly.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [214-214]
The renaming of leverage keeper methods is mentioned. Ensure that this renaming is consistently applied across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.
Verification successful
The extended search across the codebase, including Go files and other potentially relevant file types, has revealed multiple references to the renamed methods
ToUToken
,ToToken
, andToTokens
, as well as the old method namesExchangeToken
,ExchangeUToken
, andExchangeUTokens
. The results show that the renaming mentioned in the CHANGELOG.md has been applied consistently across the codebase, with references to the new method names found in various files, including implementation, tests, and mocks.Given the evidence from the search results, it can be concluded that the renaming of leverage keeper methods has been consistently applied across the documentation and codebase, aligning with the original review comment's concern for consistency to avoid confusion.
* 46-59: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [215-215]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the consistent renaming of leverage keeper methods across the codebase rg --type md --type yaml --type json 'ExchangeToken|ExchangeUToken|ExchangeUTokens'Length of output: 284
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extend the search to include Go files and other potentially relevant file types for a comprehensive verification rg 'ExchangeToken|ExchangeUToken|ExchangeUTokens|ToUToken|ToToken|ToTokens'Length of output: 8225
The terms "ToUTokenDenom", "StripUTokenDenom", and "HasUTokenPrefix" are used. Consider explaining the significance of these operations in the context of the coin package, especially if they affect token handling or system behavior.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [216-216]
The phrase "Rework proposal messages. Remove Title from
ugov/MsgGovSetIBCStatus
,ugov/MsgGovUpdateQuota
,leverage/MsgGovUpdateRegistry
" might benefit from a more detailed explanation or example to clarify the change and its impact on the system.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [217-217]
The term "Remove 'Get' prefix from cli/ ref tests" is mentioned. Ensure that this change is consistently applied across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.
Verification successful
The instances of 'Get' found in the codebase, as per the script output, are primarily in documentation and design documents, not specifically related to CLI reference tests. The change mentioned in the CHANGELOG.md about removing the 'Get' prefix from CLI reference tests does not seem to be contradicted by these findings. Therefore, the review comment appears to be based on a correct understanding of the intended scope of changes.
* 46-59: > 📝 **NOTE** > This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [223-223]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the consistent removal of 'Get' prefix from CLI reference tests across the codebase rg --type md --type yaml --type json 'Get'Length of output: 4424
The term "Bump CometBFT to 34.29" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and implications of updating CometBFT are clear to readers, especially if it affects system performance or consensus.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [224-224]
The term "Adding Amino support to
x/leverage.MsgLeveragedLiquidate
" is mentioned. Consider providing a brief explanation or context for this change, especially if it introduces new functionality or compatibility considerations.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [228-228]
The term "Allowing duplicate symbols on leverage token registry" is mentioned twice. Ensure that the context and implications of this change are clear to readers, especially if it affects token management or system behavior.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [232-232]
The term "Fix MsgBeginUnbonding counting existing unbondings against max unbond twice" is mentioned. Consider providing a brief explanation or context for this fix, especially if it addresses a critical issue or improves system reliability.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [233-233]
The term "Fix MsgLeverageLiquidate CLI not actually allowing wildcard denoms" is mentioned. Ensure that the context and purpose of this fix are clear to readers, especially if it enhances user experience or functionality.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [238-238]
The term "Fixes an x/oracle RPC endpoint spelling" is mentioned. Ensure that this fix is consistently applied across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.
Verification successful
The verification process indicates that the spelling correction from "valdiators" to "validators" for the x/oracle RPC endpoint has been consistently applied across the documentation and codebase within markdown, YAML, and JSON files. The only occurrence of the misspelled term is within the CHANGELOG.md file, referencing the pull request where the correction was made. This suggests that there are no inconsistencies within the searched file types.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the consistent spelling correction of the x/oracle RPC endpoint across the codebase rg --type md --type yaml --type json 'valdiators'Length of output: 294
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2455 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.38% 68.92% -6.47%
==========================================
Files 100 184 +84
Lines 8025 10830 +2805
==========================================
+ Hits 6050 7465 +1415
- Misses 1589 2755 +1166
- Partials 386 610 +224
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 8
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (4 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- RELEASE_NOTES.md (1 hunks)
- docs/VALIDATOR.md (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 25
RELEASE_NOTES.md (5)
- 7-7: The link to the contributing document is helpful for understanding the release procedure. However, it might be beneficial to briefly summarize the key steps or requirements directly in the release notes for easier access.
- 13-14: The update to Cosmos SDK v0.47.10 and the integration of ICS20 Memo handling in IBC Hooks are significant highlights. It's important to ensure that these updates are thoroughly tested, especially the IBC Hooks integration, as it affects cross-chain transactions.
- 15-16: The updates to
uibc/MsgGovUpdateQuota
anduibc/QueryAllOutflowsResponse
are crucial for handling new inflow parameters and including denom symbols in outflows. Ensure that these changes are reflected in the corresponding API documentation and that any client code consuming these messages is updated accordingly.- 22-28: The introduction of
x/leverage
messages for cross-chain money market transactions is a significant feature. It's essential to ensure that the implementation of these messages is secure and efficient, especially considering the requirement that the operation can only use tokens as part of the IBC transfer. Additionally, the lack of Authz support should be clearly documented to avoid confusion.- 38-43: The update to
libwasmvm v1.5.2
is critical for ensuring compatibility with the new binary. It's important to provide clear instructions for both building from source and downloading binaries, including specific commands for different operating systems if necessary. Additionally, the mention of the Docker image is helpful, but ensure that the Docker documentation also reflects this version requirement.docs/VALIDATOR.md (7)
- 7-7: The note about the documentation potentially not being up-to-date is important. Consider providing a last-updated timestamp or version number on the documentation page to help users gauge the currency of the information.
- 13-14: Clarifying the importance of using the correct binary for the testnet or mainnet is crucial. It might be helpful to provide direct links to the binaries for both networks to minimize confusion and ensure validators download the correct version.
- 4-22: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [19-29]
The instructions for obtaining the
umeed
binary and handlinglibwasmvm
are clear. However, ensure that the version placeholders are consistently replaced with the actual version numbers in the final documentation to avoid confusion.
- 29-29: The instruction to download the right binary build and
libwasmvm
is crucial for validators. It might be beneficial to include a troubleshooting section for common issues encountered during this process, such as incorrect library versions or compatibility issues.- 42-42: The note about self-building and configuration examples is helpful. Ensure that the links provided are accessible and up-to-date to prevent validators from encountering broken links or outdated information.
- 49-49: Updating configuration files based on preference is an important step. It might be helpful to provide examples of common configurations or link to a guide on optimizing these settings for different validator setups.
- 4-22: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [58-88]
The instructions for joining the network, both testnet and mainnet, are comprehensive. It's crucial to ensure that all links, especially to external resources like Discord servers, snapshots, and instructions, are kept up-to-date to prevent validators from encountering dead ends.
README.md (1)
- 63-69: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [112-112]
The section on the recommended database backend mentions a future migration to a newer version of badgerdb. It's important to ensure that this information is kept up-to-date and that any migration plans are clearly communicated to users to avoid confusion.
CHANGELOG.md (12)
- 56-56: The term "Noop Axelar GMP handler" might be unclear to some readers. Consider providing a brief explanation or link to documentation for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [60-60]
The use of abbreviations like "UX" and "
uux
" for denom aliases might not be clear to all readers. Consider expanding these abbreviations or providing a footnote for clarity.
- 65-65: The term "
sdkclient
acc sequence setting" uses an abbreviation ("acc") that might not be clear to all readers. Consider using the full term "account" for clarity.- 66-66: The abbreviation "ibc" should be capitalized as "IBC" to maintain consistency and professionalism in documentation.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [73-73]
The term "params" is used, which is an abbreviation for "parameters". In formal documentation, it's generally better to use the full term "parameters" to ensure clarity and professionalism.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [79-79]
The term "
oracle/MissCounters
query" might be unclear to some readers. Consider providing a brief explanation or link to documentation for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [86-86]
The term "metoken endblocker" might be unclear or a typo. If it refers to a specific component or feature, consider providing a brief explanation or correcting the term if it's a typo.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [88-88]
The phrase "Ensure Umee and SDK account sequence setting changes the calling client" might be grammatically incorrect or unclear. Consider rephrasing for clarity.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [92-92]
The renaming of "Umee and SDK client
WithAccSeq
toSetAccSeq
" is mentioned. Ensure that this renaming is consistently applied across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [98-98]
The terms "MaxBorrow" and "MaxWithdraw" are mentioned. Ensure that these terms are clearly defined and consistently used throughout the documentation.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [110-110]
The renaming of "TotalOutflowSum" to "OutflowSum" and "TotalInflowSum" to "InflowSum" is mentioned. Ensure that this renaming is consistently applied across the documentation and codebase to avoid confusion.
- 46-59: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [122-122]
The term "metoken" might be unclear or a typo. If it refers to a specific component or feature, consider providing a brief explanation or correcting the term if it's a typo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- RELEASE_NOTES.md (1 hunks)
- docs/VALIDATOR.md (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 13
RELEASE_NOTES.md (6)
- 7-7: The document correctly references the Release Procedure in the CONTRIBUTING document. This is a good practice for guiding contributors.
- 13-14: The highlights section succinctly summarizes key updates, including the Cosmos SDK patch update and IBC Hooks integration. However, the spelling suggestions from static analysis tools for "uibc" are incorrect; "uibc" seems to be a specific term related to the project and not a spelling mistake.
- 22-28: The explanation of the
x/leverage
messages and their operational constraints is clear and informative. It's important for users to understand these limitations, especially regarding token usage and actions on behalf of others. The note about Authz not being supported is also crucial for setting expectations.- 32-34: The upgrade title and instruction to update the Price Feeder are straightforward. However, ensure that all validators are aware of the
umee/2.4.2+
requirement and check the compatibility matrix for any additional dependencies or version specifics.- 36-43: The libwasmvm update instructions are detailed and provide clear steps for different scenarios (building from source, downloading binaries, using Docker). This is helpful for ensuring compatibility across various deployment methods. The inclusion of specific commands for updating
libwasmvm
is particularly useful.- 4-46: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [48-55]
The upgrade instructions are comprehensive, covering binary updates,
libwasmvm
linking, and the software upgrade proposal process. The reminder to ensure the latest Price Feeder is running and to check the price feeder config is up to date is essential for validators. The mention of Cosmovisor for automated upgrades is a good practice.docs/VALIDATOR.md (6)
- 7-7: The link to the full documentation at learning.ux.xyz is helpful, but the note about it potentially not being up-to-date could lead to confusion. It might be beneficial to provide a last updated date or direct users to the most reliable source of information.
Consider adding a last updated date for the documentation or directing users to the most reliable source of information to avoid confusion.
- 13-14: The guidance on selecting the correct binary for testnet or mainnet and consulting chain upgrades is crucial for validators. This ensures they are using the appropriate versions and are aware of any necessary actions during upgrades.
- 19-29: The instructions for obtaining the
umeed
binary are clear and provide multiple options, including building from source, downloading a binary build, and using a Docker container. The emphasis on copyinglibwasmvm
for compatibility is important. However, ensure that the version placeholders<version>
are correctly replaced by validators with the actual version numbers.- 42-42: The note about using the umee branch for self-building and configuration examples of the Price Feeder is helpful. It ensures validators are using the correct version and configurations for the Umee network.
- 49-49: The instruction to set non-zero min gas prices in
app.toml
is crucial for the proper functioning of a node. It's good practice to query the minimum acceptable value to ensure validators are configuring their nodes correctly.- 85-88: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [58-88]
The detailed steps for joining the testnet and mainnet provide a comprehensive guide for validators. The inclusion of specific instructions, such as using the Discord server for support and following state sync instructions, is beneficial. The recommendation to use Cosmovisor for mainnet nodes is a good practice for automated upgrades.
README.md (1)
- 66-66: The status
x
for versionv6.4.x
in the Release Compatibility Matrix is ambiguous. Please clarify whatx
represents in this context. Is it meant to indicate that this version is not yet compatible, or is it a placeholder for future updates?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- RELEASE_NOTES.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
RELEASE_NOTES.md (4)
- 7-7: The link to the contributing document is helpful for understanding the release procedure. However, it might be beneficial to briefly summarize the key steps or highlights of the release process directly in the release notes for easier access.
- 13-14: The update to Cosmos SDK v0.47.10 and the integration of ICS20 Memo handling in IBC Hooks are significant highlights. It's clear and concise, effectively communicating the major updates in this release.
- 14-16: The spelling of
uibc
inuibc/MsgGovUpdateQuota
anduibc/QueryAllOutflowsResponse
might be a typo or a specific project naming convention. If it's a typo, consider correcting it to a more recognized prefix likeibc
. If it's intentional, ensure consistency across the documentation.Verification successful
The search results confirm that 'uibc' is used consistently across the project's documentation and codebase, indicating that it is a project-specific convention rather than a typo. The presence of a dedicated directory and documentation for 'uibc' further supports this conclusion. Therefore, the spelling of 'uibc' in
uibc/MsgGovUpdateQuota
anduibc/QueryAllOutflowsResponse
is intentional and consistent with the project's naming conventions.* 32-43: The upgrade instructions for validators, including the update to Price Feeder and the `libwasmvm` update, are detailed and informative. However, the mention of `libwasmvm..so` could benefit from a brief explanation or link to documentation for users unfamiliar with CPU architecture notations.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if 'uibc' is a project-specific convention or a typo. rg --type md 'uibc/' RELEASE_NOTES.mdLength of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search the entire codebase for occurrences of 'uibc/' to check for consistency. rg 'uibc/' --type md --type js --type ts # Search for 'ibc/' to compare its usage with 'uibc/'. rg 'ibc/' --type md --type js --type tsLength of output: 5299
Description
docs
Summary by CodeRabbit
x/leverage
messages for cross-chain money market transactions.converter
helper app.sdkclient
account sequence setting issue.docs/VALIDATOR.md
.